"Growing fibroadenoma": Are there clinical and pathological features predicting a phyllodes tumor on surgical excision?

In cases of growth of FA on imaging, core needle biopsies (CNB) are often performed to rule out phyllodes tumor (PT). We aim to focus on "growing FAs" and to identify clinical and histopathologic features that are likely to predict a PT on excision. Thirty-four FAs with radiologic documentation of growth were included. Various clinical and pathological features such as age, body mass index (BMI), lesion size, and growth rate were recorded. On excision, 17 cases (50 %) were FAs, whereas 16 (47 %) were re-classified as benign PT despite only 19 % being suspicious for PT on CNB. PT patients were older (mean age 42.6) than those with FAs (mean age 28.2), p = 0.0002. All false negative cases demonstrated intracanalicular growth. Mitotic rate was the most significant histologic feature in PT on excision compared to others, such as lesion circumscription and stromal cellularity. Recognition and careful counting of mitotic rate, especially with intracanalicular patterns in growing FAs, can potentially prevent missing a PT on CNB. In patients with "growing FAs" who are ≥40 years of age, excision may be recommended due to the high likelihood of PT diagnosis on excision and high false negative rate on CNB.

Cell fitness screens reveal a conflict between LINE-1 retrotransposition and DNA replication.

LINE-1 retrotransposon overexpression is a hallmark of human cancers. We identified a colorectal cancer wherein a fast-growing tumor subclone downregulated LINE-1, prompting us to examine how LINE-1 expression affects cell growth. We find that nontransformed cells undergo a TP53-dependent growth arrest and activate interferon signaling in response to LINE-1. TP53 inhibition allows LINE-1+ cells to grow, and genome-wide-knockout screens show that these cells require replication-coupled DNA-repair pathways, replication-stress signaling and replication-fork restart factors. Our findings demonstrate that LINE-1 expression creates specific molecular vulnerabilities and reveal a retrotransposition-replication conflict that may be an important determinant of cancer growth.

LINE-1 ORF2p expression is nearly imperceptible in human cancers.

BACKGROUND: Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1, L1) is the major driver of mobile DNA activity in modern humans. When expressed, LINE-1 loci produce bicistronic transcripts encoding two proteins essential for retrotransposition, ORF1p and ORF2p. Many types of human cancers are characterized by L1 promoter hypomethylation, L1 transcription, L1 ORF1p protein expression, and somatic L1 retrotransposition. ORF2p encodes the endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities required for L1 retrotransposition. Its expression is poorly characterized in human tissues and cell lines. RESULTS: We report mass spectrometry-based tumor proteome profiling studies wherein ORF2p eludes detection. To test whether ORF2p could be detected with specific reagents, we developed and validated five rabbit monoclonal antibodies with immunoreactivity for specific epitopes on the protein. These reagents readily detect ectopic ORF2p expressed from bicistronic L1 constructs. However, endogenous ORF2p is not detected in human tumor samples or cell lines by western blot, immunoprecipitation, or immunohistochemistry despite high levels of ORF1p expression. Moreover, we report endogenous ORF1p-associated interactomes, affinity isolated from colorectal cancers, wherein we similarly fail to detect ORF2p. These samples include primary tumors harboring hundreds of somatically acquired L1 insertions. The new data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD013743. CONCLUSIONS: Although somatic retrotransposition provides unequivocal genetic evidence for the expression of ORF2p in human cancers, we are unable to directly measure its presence using several standard methods. Experimental systems have previously indicated an unequal stoichiometry between ORF1p and ORF2p, but in vivo, the expression of these two proteins may be more strikingly uncoupled. These findings are consistent with observations that ORF2p is not tolerable for cell growth.

High mobility group A1 (HMGA1) protein and gene expression correlate with ER-negativity and poor outcomes in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) chromatin remodeling protein is required for metastatic progression and cancer stem cell properties in preclinical breast cancer models, although its role in breast carcinogenesis has remained unclear. To investigate HMGA1 in primary breast cancer, we evaluated immunoreactivity score (IRS) in tumors from a large cohort of Asian women; HMGA1 gene expression was queried from two independent Western cohorts. METHODS: HMGA1 IRS was generated from breast tumors in Korean women as the product of staining intensity (weak = 1, moderate = 2, strong = 3) and percent positive cells (< 5% = 0, 5-30% = 1, 30-60% = 2, > 60% = 3), and stratified into three groups: low (< 3), intermediate (3-6), high (> 6). We assessed HMGA1 and estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene expression from two large databases (TCGA, METABRIC). Overall survival was ascertained from the METABRIC cohort. RESULTS: Among 540 primary tumors from Korean women (181 ER-negative, 359 ER-positive), HMGA1 IRS was < 3 in 89 (16.5%), 3-6 in 215 (39.8%), and > 6 in 236 (43.7%). High HMGA1 IRS was associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negativity (χ2 = 12.07; P = 0.002) and advanced nuclear grade (χ2 = 12.83; P = 0.012). In two large Western cohorts, the HMGA1 gene was overexpressed in breast cancers compared to non-malignant breast tissue (P < 0.0001), including Asian, African American, and Caucasian subgroups. HMGA1 was highest in ER-negative tumors and there was a strong inverse correlation between HMGA1 and ESR1 gene expression (Pearson r = - 0.60, P < 0.0001). Most importantly, high HMGA1 predicted decreased overall survival (P < 0.0001) for all women with breast cancer and further stratified ER-positive tumors into those with inferior outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our results suggest that HMGA1 contributes to estrogen-independence, tumor progression, and poor outcomes. Moreover, further studies are warranted to determine whether HMGA1 could serve as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target for women with breast cancer.

Caspase-1 from Human Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Can Promote T Cell-Independent Tumor Proliferation.

Immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) are characterized by their phenotypic and functional heterogeneity. To better define their T cell-independent functions within the tumor, sorted monocytic CD14+CD11b+HLA-DRlow/- MDSCs (mMDSC) from squamous cell carcinoma patients showed upregulated caspase-1 activity, which was associated with increased IL1ß and IL18 expression. In vitro studies demonstrated that mMDSCs promoted caspase-1-dependent proliferation of multiple squamous carcinoma cell lines in both human and murine systems. In vivo, growth rates of B16, MOC1, and Panc02 were significantly blunted in chimeric mice adoptively transferred with caspase-1 null bone marrow cells under T cell-depleted conditions. Adoptive transfer of wild-type Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs from tumor-bearing mice reversed this antitumor response, whereas caspase-1 inhibiting thalidomide-treated MDSCs phenocopied the antitumor response found in caspase-1 null mice. We further hypothesized that MDSC caspase-1 activity could promote tumor-intrinsic MyD88-dependent carcinogenesis. In mice with wild-type caspase-1, MyD88-silenced tumors displayed reduced growth rate, but in chimeric mice with caspase-1 null bone marrow cells, MyD88-silenced tumors did not display differential tumor growth rate. When we queried the TCGA database, we found that caspase-1 expression is correlated with overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that caspase-1 in MDSCs is a direct T cell-independent mediator of tumor proliferation. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(5); 566-77. ©2018 AACR.

PBOV1 as a potential biomarker for more advanced prostate cancer based on protein and digital histomorphometric analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are few tissue-based biomarkers that can accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) progression and aggressiveness. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of prostate and breast overexpressed 1 (PBOV1) as a potential PCa biomarker. METHODS: Patient tumor samples were designated by Grade Groups using the 2014 Gleason grading system. Primary radical prostatectomy tumors were obtained from 48 patients and evaluated for PBOV1 levels using Western blot analysis in matched cancer and benign cancer-adjacent regions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PBOV1 was subsequently performed in 80 cancer and 80 benign cancer-adjacent patient samples across two tissue microarrays (TMAs) to verify protein levels in epithelial tissue and to assess correlation between PBOV1 proteins and nuclear architectural changes in PCa cells. Digital histomorphometric analysis was used to track 22 parameters that characterized nuclear changes in PBOV1-stained cells. Using a training and test set for validation, multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models were used to identify significant nuclear parameters that distinguish Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa regions. RESULTS: PBOV1 protein levels were increased in tumors from Grade Group 3 and above (GS 4 + 3 and ≥ 8) regions versus Grade Groups 1 and 2 (GS 3 + 3 and 3 + 4) regions (P = 0.005) as assessed by densitometry of immunoblots. Additionally, by immunoblotting, PBOV1 protein levels differed significantly between Grade Group 2 (GS 3 + 4) and Grade Group 3 (GS 4 + 3) PCa samples (P = 0.028). In the immunohistochemical analysis, measures of PBOV1 staining intensity strongly correlated with nuclear alterations in cancer cells. An MLR model retaining eight parameters describing PBOV1 staining intensity and nuclear architecture discriminated Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa and benign cancer-adjacent regions with a ROC-AUC of 0.90 and 0.80, respectively, in training and test sets. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the PBOV1 protein could be used to discriminate Grade Group 3 and above PCa. Additionally, the PBOV1 protein could be involved in modulating changes to the nuclear architecture of PCa cells. Confirmatory studies are warranted in an independent population for further validation.

STAT3 regulates arginase-I in myeloid-derived suppressor cells from cancer patients.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) play a key immunosuppressive role in various types of cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study, we characterized CD14+HLA-DR(-/lo) cells sorted from the tumors, draining lymph nodes, and peripheral blood of HNSCC patients. CD14+HLA-DR(-/lo) cells were phenotyped as CD11b+, CD33+, CD34+, arginase-I+, and ROS+. In all 3 compartments, they suppressed autologous, antigen-independent T cell proliferation in a differential manner. The abundance of MDSC correlated with stage, but did not correlate with previous treatment with radiation or subsites of HNSCC. Interestingly, MDSC from all 3 compartments showed high phosphorylated STAT3 levels that correlated with arginase-I expression levels and activity. Stattic, a STAT3-specific inhibitor, and STAT3-targeted siRNA abrogated MDSC's suppressive function. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling also resulted in decreased arginase-I activity. Analysis of the human arginase-I promoter region showed multiple STAT3-binding elements, and ChIP demonstrated that phosphorylated STAT3 binds to multiple sites in the arginase-I promoter. Finally, rescue of arginase-I activity after STAT3 blockade restored MDSC's suppressive function. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the suppressive function of arginase-I in both infiltrating and circulating MDSC is a downstream target of activated STAT3.

New technology and clinical applications of nanomedicine.

Nanomedicine is the use of nanotechnology to achieve innovative medical breakthroughs. Nanomedicine, with its broad range of ideas, hypotheses, concepts, and undeveloped clinical devices, is still in its early stage. This article outlines present developments and future prospects for the use of nanotechnology techniques in experimental in vivo and in vitro studies and in engineering nanodevices and biosensors for clinical and investigative use n diagnosis and therapy in the fields of genetics, oncology, cardiology, and dermatology. Toxicologic considerations also are discussed.

Nanomedicine and drug delivery.

This article discusses the use of nanotechnology in drug delivery approaches. Magnetic nanotechnology is finding wide applications in medicine, most notably in MRI and magnetic separation. The impedance biosensor is expected to find applications in monitoring cytokines in cancer, bone turnover markers in osteoporosis, and understanding neural-degenerative diseases.